Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog
Your impression of this publication Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog will lead you to obtain what you specifically require. As one of the impressive books, this book will certainly provide the presence of this leaded Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog to collect. Also it is juts soft file; it can be your cumulative data in gizmo and other gadget. The crucial is that use this soft file book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog to check out and take the benefits. It is what we imply as publication Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog will boost your ideas and also mind. After that, reading book will certainly likewise boost your life top quality much better by taking good activity in balanced.
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog
Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog
Make use of the sophisticated modern technology that human creates today to locate guide Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog quickly. Yet initially, we will certainly ask you, how much do you enjoy to review a book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog Does it consistently until surface? Wherefore does that book read? Well, if you really enjoy reading, aim to review the Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog as one of your reading compilation. If you just checked out the book based on need at the time and unfinished, you need to attempt to like reading Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog first.
In some cases, reading Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog is very uninteresting and it will certainly take very long time beginning with obtaining the book and also start checking out. Nonetheless, in contemporary age, you could take the developing innovation by using the net. By net, you can visit this page and also start to look for the book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog that is needed. Wondering this Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog is the one that you require, you could opt for downloading and install. Have you comprehended ways to get it?
After downloading and install the soft data of this Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog, you can begin to read it. Yeah, this is so pleasurable while someone needs to review by taking their huge books; you are in your new means by just manage your gizmo. Or even you are working in the office; you can still utilize the computer system to read Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog fully. Certainly, it will not obligate you to take several web pages. Simply page by web page relying on the moment that you need to review Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog
After recognizing this really easy means to review and also get this Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog, why do not you inform to others about by doing this? You can tell others to see this web site and also opt for looking them favourite books Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog As known, right here are great deals of listings that provide numerous type of books to collect. Merely prepare couple of time and web connections to obtain the books. You can really take pleasure in the life by reviewing Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard To Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), By Hal Herzog in a very simple fashion.
“Everybody who is interested in the ethics of our relationship between humans and animals should read this book.”
—Temple Grandin, author of Animals Make Us Human
Hal Herzog, a maverick scientist and leader in the field of anthrozoology offers a controversial, thought-provoking, and unprecedented exploration of the psychology behind the inconsistent and often paradoxical ways we think, feel, and behave towards animals. A cross between Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma and Bill Bryson’s A Walk in the Woods, Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat, in the words of Irene M. Pepperberg, bestselling author of Alex & Me, “deftly blends anecdote with scientific research to show how almost any moral or ethical position regarding our relationship with animals can lead to absurd consequences.”
- Sales Rank: #32168 in Books
- Published on: 2011-09-05
- Released on: 2011-08-09
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.00" h x .83" w x 5.31" l, .61 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 368 pages
From Publishers Weekly
How rational are we in our relationship with animals? A puppy, after all, is "a family member in Kansas, a pariah in Kenya, and lunch in Korea". An animal behaviorist turned one of the world's foremost authorities on human-animal relations, Herzog shows us, in this readable study, how whimsical our attitudes can be. Why do we like some animals but not others? One answer seems to be that babylike features like big eyes bring out our parental and protective urges. (PETA has started a campaign against fishing called "Save the Sea Kittens)." Research has shown that the human brain is wired to think about animals and inanimate objects differently, and Herzog reveals how we can look at the exact same animal very differently given its context--most Americans regard cockfighting as cruel but think nothing of eating chicken, when in reality gamecocks are treated very well when they are not fighting, and most poultry headed for the table lead short, miserable lives and are killed quite painfully. An intelligent and amusing book that invites us to think deeply about how we define--and where we limit--our empathy for animals.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
“Wonderful. . . . An engagingly written book that only seems to be about animals. Herzog’s deepest questions are about men, women and children.” (Karen Sandstrom, Cleveland Plain Dealer)
“A fun read. . . . What buoys this book is Herzog’s voice. He’s an assured, knowledgeable and friendly guide.” (Associated Press)
“A fascinating, thoughtful, and thoroughly enjoyable exploration of a major dimension of human experience.” (Steven Pinker, Harvard College Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and author of How the Mind Works and The Stuff of Thought)
“Everybody who is interested in the ethics of our relationship between humans and animals should read this book.” (Temple Grandin, author of Animals Make Us Human)
“An instant classic….Written so accessibly and personally, while simultaneously satisfying the scholar in all of us.” (Arnold Arluke, Anthrozoös)
“Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat is both educational and enjoyable, a page-turner that I dare say puts Herzog in the same class as Malcolm Gladwell and Michael Lewis. Read this book. You’ll learn some, you’ll laugh some, you’ll love some.” (BookPage)
“Hal Herzog deftly blends anecdote with scientific research to show how almost any moral or ethical position regarding our relationship with animals can lead to absurd consequences. In an utterly appealing narrative, he reveals the quirky…ways we humans try to make sense of these absurdities.” (Irene M. Pepperberg, author of Alex & Me: How a Scientist and a Parrot Uncovered a Hidden World of Animal Intelligence and Formed a Deep Bond in the Process)
“One of a kind. I don’t know when I’ve read anything more comprehensive about our highly involved, highly contradictory relationships with animals, relationships which we mindlessly, placidly continue no matter how irrational they may be….This page-turning book is quite something—you won’t forget it any time soon.” (Elizabeth Marshall Thomas, author of The Hidden Life of Deer: Lessons from the Natural World)
“Hal Herzog does for our relationships with animals what Michael Pollan’s Omnivore’s Dilemma did for our relationships with food….The book is a joy to read, and no matter what your beliefs are now, it will change how you think.” (Sam Gosling, Professor of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, author of Snoop: What Your Stuff Says About You)
“This is a wonderful book—wildly readable, funny, scientifically sound, and with surprising moments of deep, challenging thoughts. I loved it.” (Robert M. Sapolsky, Neuroscientist, Stanford University, and author of Monkeyluv and A Primate's Memoir)
From the Back Cover
Does living with a pet really make people happier and healthier? What can we learn from biomedical research with mice? Who enjoys a better quality of life—–the chicken destined for your dinner plate or the rooster in a Saturday night cockfight? Why is it wrong to eat the family dog?
Drawing on more than two decades of research into the emerging field of anthrozoology, the science of human–animal relations, Hal Herzog offers an illuminating exploration of the fierce moral conundrums we face every day regarding the creatures with whom we share our world. Alternately poignant, challenging, and laugh-out-loud funny—blending anthropology, behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology, and philosophy—this enlightening and provocative book will forever change the way we look at our relationships with other creatures and, ultimately, how we see ourselves.
Most helpful customer reviews
139 of 145 people found the following review helpful.
Our skewed moral calculus about animals
By Herblady22
Hal Herzog is fascinated with our moral relationships with animals, the contradictions we feel and the ethical problems when we avoid contradictions. A dog, he points out, is a member of the household in the United States, vermin in India, and food in Korea. We humans tend not to eat animals we either adore or despise. As Koreans and Chinese have started keeping pets, they have become more ambivalent about eating dog meat and relegate certain species to the dog trade.
Herzog is an anthrozoologist who studies the interactions between humans and animals. He is also possessed with a quick eye for absurdity and a broad range of interests. In this book he has visited industrial farms and Appalachian cock fights, dogmeat markets, dolphin treatment centers, loggerhead turtle nests protection runs,animal research laboratories, and rescue refuges for injured animals. Even his family pets come up for scrutiny, when an animal rights neighbor called to ask if he was feeding kittens to his new pet boa constrictor and he experienced a revulsion that he did not feel about feeding them mice. And it led to a comparison of the food a snake needs compared to a cat- 5 pounds of flesh versus 50 each year which leaves a moral burden of owning a cat ten times that of a boa. Herzog writes well. I had trouble putting the book down, stopping only to ponder some of the questions he raises.
Like most of us, Herzog eats meat, wears leather shoes, but thinks that animals should not suffer. He foreswears veal, spends more money to get chickens that roamed under open skies, and is more troubled by the use of laboratory animals for safe eye makeup than for medicine. But he spends time with animal rights activists of all stripes, giving them a fair hearing and pointing out where people he may disagree with are correct.
For instance he looks at regulations protecting lab animals. Dogs are entitled to a period of play each day while cats are not. Mice have very little regulation, but a lab mouse is entitled to more protection than a wild mouse in the same lab, even if most of the wild mice are escapees from the experiments. He goes so far as to design a series of animal experiments and submitted them for approval to Animal Care Committees at research universities, expecting similar responses. In fact approvals varied 80% of the time and were quite arbitrary.
In fact Herzog tells us that the most comprehensive legal protections for animals, which still are admirable, were developed in Nazi Germany while human beings were tortured and slaughtered. The cognitive dissonance is amazing.
But he points out that we have our own cognitive dissonance. Why do we treat cockfighting as more cruel than the slaughter of chicken for food? Your average Tennessee gamecock will be pampered during its two year life, running free with 150 feet of lawn and a private bed, fed special rations, being exercised like an athlete, able to mate, then sliced by the Mexican short knife after a fight to the death. Your average industrially raised Cobb 500 chick will live in utter squalor, bred too large for its aching legs, lungs burning for 24 hours a day from ammonia-laden air, never seeing daylight, pumped full of medicated chicken chow, then will be jammed into a crate, suspended upside down and electrocuted around its 42nd day of life. Herzog gives the red light to both activities, but sees the hypocrisy of trying to make cockfighting a felony while permitting wholesale torture for food production.
He looks at vegetarians, and vegans and ex-vegetarians: 97-99% of Americans eat some flesh including 60% of people who call themselves vegetarians but ate meat in the past 24 hours. There are 3 times as many ex-vegetarians than vegetarians, usually because they often felt sick. Actual vegetarians can range from his friend Pete who is disgusted by meat but will shoot the racoons who steal his vegetables, to people who wrestle with taking the life of a carrot, much less a fish. Herzog considers the various theories of animal rights, from an absolutist vision where choosing between saving a baby or a hamster in a fire is equivalent, to considering an animal's ability to suffer, its level of cognition or more arbitrary determinants (say cuteness) to decide whether one can kill or eat an animal. Is it better to kill 200 chickens or one cow? How about 70,000 chickens or one blue whale?
Since this book deals with the morality of killing animals. I wish that Herzog had looked at the religious treatments of killing for food or ceremony. Both Kosher and Halal restrictions look seriously at the treatment of animals, before and during slaughter. Even the separation of milk and meat is justified by revulsion over the idea that a kid might be stewed in its mother's milk. And Kosher vegetables must be inspected to not inadvertently kill and consume insects, which would be more sinful than eating pork. A friend who is a priest of Ifa, will ceremonially kill and eat chickens or African rats, but is otherwise vegetarian. A college professor spent time with a tribe of nominally vegetarian New Guinnean natives who four times a year would religiously kill a boar and distribute its meat to every member. There is much to be learned from religious attitudes towards killing food.
This is a book that will change the way you look at food and our relationship with animals no matter where you are coming from. He wrestles with complexity, personally coming down on the side of non-food fundamentalism, an omnivore who takes animal consciousness seriously. I highly recommend it.
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful.
Great Browsing Book
By KC
Some books are made for cover-to-cover readings. Others hold up nicely as "dippers" -- books you can read either intermittently or by selecting chapters and sections willy-nilly. Hal Herzog's SOME WE LOVE, SOME WE HATE, SOME WE EAT falls into the latter category. His chapter titles are clever, while the sub-headings provide the actual topic. For instance, we get "Pet-O-Philia: Why Do Humans (and Only Humans) Love Pets?" and "Prom Queen Kills First Deer On Sixteenth Birthday: Gender and the Human-Animal Relationship" and "Delicious, Dangerous, Disgusting, and Dead: The Human-Meat Relationship." The titular games set a tone, actually, as Herzog introduces anthrozoology in chapter one as a "new science of human-animal interactions," then has fun with it, being serious all along, of course.
The pleasures in the book are mostly of the "interesting tidbit" and "food for thought" variety. For instance, in the chapter "The Importance of Being Cute," Herzog explains how the Nazis managed to raise dogs above Jews, gypsies, and homosexuals in the social construct because Hitler, believe it or not, loved animals. In the same chapter, he wonders what it is like to be a spider. Do spiders have feelings too? Here we get into the squishy side of this "new science" as Herzog includes an anecdote (real or apocryphal, I can't say) of an arachnologist who constructs a web of rubber tubes and sits in the middle of it to find out.
"Pet-O-Philia" examines our tendency to turn pets into people (benign shades of the Nazis?) by dressing them in clothes and sleeping in bed with them. "Friends, Foes, and Fashion Statements" tackles the tendency for breeds to become popular. It discusses the controversy surrounding pit bulls and rottweilers. Some localities have tried to outright ban the breeds, yet studies show that dachshunds and chihuahuas bite more often. What skews the data? The numbers of the breed. A huge burst in popularity for pit bulls increased their numbers which in turn exaggerated the number of incidents.
In one ethical section of the book, Herzog meets with and even admits to liking many cockfighters. He condemns the practice, but shows that the cocks are often treated much more humanely than the chickens we eat every day. Hypocrisy? Herzog thinks so. And he gives us this: "The comedian Chris Rock made the same point on national television in response to a photograph of Sarah Palin, then governor of Alaska and an avid big-game hunter. He told Letterman, 'She's holding a dead, bloody moose. And Michael Vick's like, "Why am I in jail?" They let a white lady shoot a moose, but a black man wants to kill a dog? Now that's a crime.'"
If you are interested in animals -- both wild and domestic -- you can't help but be intrigued by Herzog's book. Not only has he done his research, he's not afraid to challenge his readers. Overall, it's an inviting mix.
42 of 52 people found the following review helpful.
Cognitive dissonance: gloss over it or untangle the knot?
By VampireCowboy
This is a fun, worthy read of a complex subject. The author doesn't seek to draw any "meaty" conclusions, but rather uses a deft hand and light approach to probe the way humans think of animals from a variety of angles. I found it the most intriguing when referencing studies that seem to shed light on the way our brains perceive sentient beings. I found it the clunkiest when the subject turned to vegetarianism. Characterizing self-identified vegetarians as lapsed when they eat meat misses the point. Self-identified carnivores certainly don't consider themselves lapsed when they eat vegetables. It's not all or nothing, nor is vegetarianism a religion. Herzog seems fond of bell curves and spectrums - he should open that possibility to those who consciously choose to minimize suffering/cruelty. No matter where you are on that curve, you can make choices to increase happiness for yourself and other sentient beings. One misstep doesn't invalidate it all. Still, speaking as a long time vegetarian (my carnivorous ways lapsed 15 plus years ago) married to a vegan - both of whom are concerned about the validity of animal testing in medical science - I think Herzog does a fine job of presenting a balanced view of the issues. Not sure there's much new here to shape individual decisions, nor are there strategies to clear up the evident cognitive dissonance, but there is fascinating food for thought.
See all 122 customer reviews...
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog PDF
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog EPub
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Doc
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog iBooks
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog rtf
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Mobipocket
Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Kindle
[W639.Ebook] Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Doc
[W639.Ebook] Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Doc
[W639.Ebook] Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Doc
[W639.Ebook] Free PDF Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat: Why It's So Hard to Think Straight About Animals (P.S.), by Hal Herzog Doc
